If, during the course of your airline operations you find yourself, or your 
staff literally "winging it,"  you better call Wing It Aviation 
Consulting, Inc. for a solution to your problem.  Whether that problem 
relates to airline start-up obstacles, manual production, program creation 
and/or production, crew training, regulatory compliance issues, hazmat or 
dangerous goods, or just plain general operating issues encountered during 
day-to-day airline operations, Wing It Aviation staff and associates are capable 
of handling any crisis, obstacle, or problem encountered in the airline 
industry.  Our prices are always reasonable as well as competitive.
 

 
Mission Statement
Our mission is to provide the airline industry with an outsource alternative 
for dealing with the problems and "surprises" encountered in both the start-up 
phase of an airline, and during the course of day-to-day operations once the 
airline is up and running.  Since - due to budgetary constraints - most 
start-up airlines operate with minimal staffing, when a problem arises, airline staff 
generally must either assume the task of dealing with the problem in addition to 
performing their regular duties (to the detriment of both), or be re-assigned 
from their regular duties to address the problem exclusively. In either 
circumstance the performance of the start-up airline and its staff are both compromised.
Further, experience has shown that, while most airline staff are fully 
qualified and capable of fulfilling their regular duties and responsibilities, 
they are generally inexperienced when it comes to identifying the actual 
problem, coming up with a viable solution or comprehensive fix for that problem, 
and then ill-equipped for the production of a plan, or course of action for 
rectifying the problem once identified, or in the 
alternative, its implementation in accordance with 
applicable regulations.
Wing it Aviation Consulting, Inc. is in the unique 
position of being able to step into most problems or 
"situations" encountered in the airline industry, clearly 
identify the problem, or its cause, formulate a viable 
solution or comprehensive fix for the problem, develop a plan or course of action 
to address the problem, and then implement and manage that plan or course of action through fruition.  
And doing so, generally, without disrupting day-to-day 
operations.
This has several advantages, both economical and logistical.  First of 
all, it frees management from the constraints of dealing with problems when they 
arise - beyond the awareness stage.  Second, it allows airline staff to 
stay focused on their day-to-day duties and responsibilities thereby keeping the 
airline operating on schedule.  Third, as consultants, Wing It staff do not 
have to be afraid of offending anyone in the airline corporate tree who might be 
offended by a subordinate identifying them as the cause of the problem or a 
responsible party.  Forth, Wing It staff stay focused on the problem, or 
project, and do not suffer the distractions of daily tasks outside the realm of 
the issue at hand.  These items combined produce adequate as well as 
functional solutions in the shortest possible period of time, all of which 
represent substantial financial savings for the airline.
 

 
Company Profile and Background
Wing It Aviation Consulting, Inc. was founded in 1995 to meet the specific 
needs of several South Florida airlines. Those needs were the development, FAA 
approval, and implementation of training programs for both flight crew and 
maintenance personnel.  Since that time, Wing It has expanded its field to include all phases and areas of airline operations, with its 
current staff comprised of airline professionals, with extensive airline 
management (executive and FAR 119) and/or FAA backgrounds in either flight 
operations, maintenance, or both. The youngest member of the team has over 15 
years of airline experience as a maintenance supervisor, flight engineer, pilot, instructor, 
technical writer, and member of an airline management team.
On August 7, 1997, the very day Fine Air stock went public, a Fine Air DC-8-61 
freighter (N27UA) crashed on takeoff from Miami International Airport, killing 
the four occupants of the aircraft, and one person on the ground.  In the 
months preceding that accident, both regional and national FAA inspection teams 
had come to Fine Air's headquarters located on the field of Miami International 
Airport, and conducted their individual inspections.  Since the inspection 
reports of both the FAA's regional (RASIP) and national (NASIP) inspection teams rated Fine Air as a 
professionally run operation with no apparent violations, when it came time to 
identify the cause of that crash, and assess blame, the finger-pointing could 
not go too far beyond the conclusions of those inspection reports.  
It was ascertained, and finally agreed, that the cause of the crash was 
improper cargo loading, and (although there was no hazardous materials 
being transported onboard the accident aircraft) 
hazmat was identified as an area that needed to be addressed.  Soon after 
the crash, Fine Air was pressured into "voluntarily" 
surrendering its operating certificate, and thereby ceasing its flight 
operations until a comprehensive fix was developed, approved 
and implemented.   The founder and president 
of Wing It Aviation Consulting, Inc. who was at the time employed by Fine Air as 
their Director of Training was personally approached by 
Frank Fine, the President and CEO of Fine Air, who stated:  
"I believe you're the only one in this company capable of 
getting this thing accomplished. Can you get me back in the 
air?"
Fifty-six days later, after completely re-writing the cargo loading 
procedures, completely re-writing the hazmat training program, getting 
the necessary FAA approvals, writing and publishing appropriate revisions to Fine's 
manuals, and orchestrating the training of more than 600 
newly identified Fine Air employees located in Miami, and 
both Central and South America as those requiring cargo loading procedures 
and hazmat training, through the efforts of Wing It's founder and president, 
Fine Air returned to the air.  
That 56 day time period saved Fine Air from the inevitable extinction that 
would have occurred had the time frame gone over the 'one revenue flight 
performed within the preceding 60 day' time period as specified in their 
Operations Specifications.  
Furthermore, that 56 day time period constitutes a record for an airline 
comeback following a suspension of flight operations as the result of an 
aircraft accident.  A record which has yet to be broken.
In addition to all this, the hazmat course written for the occasion became 
the model used by the regional FAA in their evaluation of other airlines.
For that effort, Wing It's founder and president was "rewarded" with 
an 
appointment to the position of Director of Safety of Fine 
Air at the insistence of the FAA.  That additional title expanded 
the responsibility to include developing, implementing and managing Fine Air's Internal 
Evaluation Program.
Fine Air's initial Internal Evaluation Program (based on 
the the FAA's model Internal Evaluation Program) had 
some serious flaws inherent in its design.  In that FAA model program, 
auditors, when needed, are supplied by the various departments within the company, selected and assigned 
by a department supervisor to whom the individual auditors answer during normal work assignments 
other than the audit team assignment.  The logical question being, 
in this arrangement, during an audit 
of a particular department, to whom would the auditor be loyal, the audit team supervisor or the supervisor who 
assigned them to that team and who would no doubt become 
their supervisor once the audit was complete?  In an 
ideal world, the answer would be it shouldn't matter, but in 
the real world politics of airline management, the reality is the assigned auditor would 
be loyal to his or her normal daily supervisor, with the end result being the 
department audit would be biased, and perhaps compromised.
This design flaw was rectified by restructuring the Fine Air training department. 
Would-be auditors were selected from the various departments within the airline, 
and interviewed.  Those with a teaching, instructor, or supervisory 
background, or those with a desire and/or natural ability to teach were given 
the opportunity to become instructors, and then, once their individual 
instructor training had been completed, they were assigned to the training department. 
In their new instructor position they were given the opportunity to improve the training 
programs with which they were familiar, and would be administering. The 
benefit of this employee reassignment allowed former mechanics who possess an in-depth knowledge of the aircraft in Fine 
Air's fleet to teach new hire and recurrent mechanic training classes, and 
former cargo handling staff with an in-depth knowledge of Fine Air's cargo 
acceptance, handling, and loading procedures to teach new hire and recurrent 
cargo handling staff with a genuine 
insights of the task at hand.  To maintain individual currency and recency 
of experience, these "new" instructors 
would be allowed to undertake general assignments within their respective department when teaching assignments were not available.  
Once implemented, quarterly safety reports showed a remarkable decline in 
on-site accidents and incidents, and dispatch reliability had increased 
significantly.
One benefit of the training department restructuring - having a pool of 
instructors available to address the day to day training needs of the company - 
allowed the founder to truly address program development.  The products 
developed during that program development soon made their way to the other cargo 
carriers in the Miami area. From that exposure, there came a point when the client base of Wing It Aviation expanded to 
where it was no longer feasible, nor practical for Wing It to be a 
part-time undertaking, and the company was launched full-time.
Since then, Wing It Aviation, Inc. has been a major contributor to 
the Pan Am International Flight Academy's A-300 B-4 training program, with Wing 
It assuming the task of writing several course presentations for Pan Am's A-300 
training curriculum.  During initial new hire classes at the Academy, it 
was not uncommon for Pan Am's own A-300 instructors to attend system 
classes, produced by Wing It for Pan Am, and using Corel Presentations.  As stated 
by one instructor, a retired Pan Am A-300 B-4 Captain:  "Your presentation 
is the only one in existence that actually shows me how the pneumatic system 
works and to the point where I can actually understand it, and I've been on this aircraft since it arrived 'new' from the factory!" 
Wing It Aviation, Inc. also produced a training video on the A-300 
Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) for the Academy, specifically developed 
and designed at the insistence of the flight crewmembers of Express.net Airways.  
Once produced and distributed the instructional video demonstrated that, when 
used by the students, two simulator sessions could be omitted under the 'train 
to proficiency' guidelines.
Recent projects include the certification of the Bahamas as a Category 1 
country through the re-certification and launching of Laker Airways (Bahamas) 
Limited, a B-727-223 aircraft operator, and the restructuring of Planet Airways 
Technical Publications department. 
 

 Back to top of page.